Contact Us

There is overwhelming evidence which proves Malachi York's innocence.  If you would like to share information pertaining to his innocence, please email us at info@nuwaubianfacts.com  or





Dr. Malachi Z. York did not received a fair trial.  The prosecutor admitted they had "scant" evidence. 

Dr. Malachi Z. York was charged with "Interstate Commerce", transporting minors across state line.  But according to a court hearing on May 14, 2002 A.D. Special Agent Jalaine Ward, of the FBI, stated on the record that they had no witnesses. And on April 1, 2003 A.D., District Attorney Richard Moultrie said prosecutors had "scant" evidence. What exactly does he mean by "scant evidence"? According to Webster's Dictionary scant means "barely sufficient".

The Prosecutors had no evidence linking Dr. Malachi Z. York to child molestation. 



  - NO DNA


But stories were saturated in the media that they have pictures and videos proving his guilt. 


Was there a Conflict of Interest?

Ques:  Did Judge C. Ashley Royal have a conflict of interest in the case against Malachi Z. York/Misnomer Dwight D York?

According to Title 28>Part1>Chapter21>455 Disqualification of Justice Judge, or Magistrate Judge he did have a conflict of interest. 


Our Constitution

Federal Court Pretrial Transcrips


[read this]

Government Key Witness Recants Her Testimony

Ques: Why is the government still holding Dr. Malachi Z York-EL with these FACTS from there lead witness?

Ans: Because, Abigail recantment proves the government targeted Dr. Malachi Z York-EL and the pretrial transcripts backs her testimony, No EVIDENCE, Agents didn't audio tape or video tape the alleged victims statements and more. (Government Conspiracy)

What happens when Black people can no longer recognize white racism? [read moor]

Dr. Malachi Z York-El caring ways

Ques:  Did he knowingly profile cases against Nuwaubians such as Gary C. Tatum, Thomas Chism,

 Tshaka Malik Al Kush, and others?

Before Ashley Royal became a judge, appointed by President Bush, he was an attorney for Jones, Cork, & Miller in Macon Georgia. While working for this law firm he represented Oconee Regional Medical Center in Civil Action Case No. 98CV34669C. This case involved the wrongful death of Roosevelt Richardson, the leader of the United Nuwaubian Nation of Moors. Mr. Roosevelt is the father in law of Malachi York and the Grandfather of three of Malachi York's children. Mr. Richardson's untimely death greatly affected the entire family. Attorney C. Ashley Royal and Oconee Regional Medical Center lost the civil case and the family was awarded a large sum of money for medical malpractice . . . 

[read this]

Medical doctors and nurses employed by Oconee Regional Medical Center negligently left a surgical sponge inside Mr. Richardson during a surgery that caused an infection in his blood and he later died a painful death after much suffering.

Did Judge Royal know there was a conflict of interest by accepting the case of Malachi Z. York?

Did he forget that he lost a case worth millions against a former leader of the Nuwaubians name Mr. Roosevelt Richardson?

Was this why Judge C. Ashley Royal sentenced Malachi Z. York 135 years in prison?

Should Judge C. Ashley Royal, ruled on forfeiture of the land at 404 Shady Dale Rd., that was deeded to Mr. Richardson's wife after his untimely death.

Should he have been a part of the trial, sentencing, restitution hearing or forfeiture against Malachi Z. York or the Nuwaubians' Land?

§ 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

(2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;

(3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy;

(4) He knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(i) Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii) Is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
(iv) Is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
(c) A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary financial interests, and make a reasonable effort to inform himself about the personal financial interests of his spouse and minor children residing in his household.
(d) For the purposes of this section the following words or phrases shall have the meaning indicated:
(1) “proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation;
(2) the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law system;
(3) “fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian;
(4) “financial interest” means ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, adviser, or other active participant in the affairs of a party, except that:
(i) Ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a “financial interest” in such securities unless the judge participates in the management of the fund;
(ii) An office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a “financial interest” in securities held by the organization;
(iii) The proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual insurance company, of a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar proprietary interest, is a “financial interest” in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the interest;
(iv) Ownership of government securities is a “financial interest” in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the securities.
(e) No justice, judge, or magistrate judge shall accept from the parties to the proceeding a waiver of any ground for disqualification enumerated in subsection (b). Where the ground for disqualification arises only under subsection (a), waiver may be accepted provided it is preceded by a full disclosure on the record of the basis for disqualification.
(f) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if any justice, judge, magistrate judge, or bankruptcy judge to whom a matter has been assigned would be disqualified, after substantial judicial time has been devoted to the matter, because of the appearance or discovery, after the matter was assigned to him or her, that he or she individually or as a fiduciary, or his or her spouse or minor child residing in his or her household, has a financial interest in a party (other than an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the justice, judge, magistrate judge, bankruptcy judge, spouse or minor child, as the case may be, divests himself or herself of the interest that provides the grounds for the disqualification.















©  Copyright 2009 Nuwaubian Facts.  All Rights Reserved.   www.nuwaubianfacts.com