Latin for "of one's own accord;
voluntarily." Used to indicate that a court has taken notice of
an issue on its own motion without prompting or suggestion from
either party.
As a general rule, where grounds for dismissal exist, an action
is subject to dismissal on a court's own motion. A trial court
has the power to dismiss an action sua sponte for want of
prosecution, or failure to comply with the rules of civil
procedure or a court's orders. A court may sua sponte enter a
motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction even though both
parties have agreed to appear in the court.
These 2 pages are from the May 9 2002 Bond
Hearing, now pay close attention to the Federal Government's
original charges against Dr. Malachi York (Misnomer
Dwight D York) and Mrs. Kathy Johnson
which all deals with Transporting Children across State lines
for unlawful purpose, so when the special agent Mrs. Juliane
Ward said in court that she didn't have a witness that said Dr.
York or Mrs. K. Johnson took them across State lines the Federal
government's case should have been (DISMISSED)
Ask yourself then why is it that Dr. York
and Kathy Johnson is in this courtroom under charges the
government has No Witnesses to back their claims, is this why
the government held Dr. York and Kathy Johnson almost two years
before bring them to trial. WOWW!!!
These are the 4 original charges and what
would have given the federal government jurisdiction in a
criminal proceeding.
What happen in this case?
Now here is page 79 of this same Bond
hearing transcripts where Special agent Mrs. Juliane Ward says
that she do not have a witness that can testify that Dr. Malachi
Z York (Misnomer Dwight D York) committed this alleged Federal
crime. The case at this point should be over, ask yourself why ? didn't
this experienced judge do his job. Do the United States
Constitution work for all the United States citizens or just the
Caucasian citizens.
PLEASE VIEW THE VIDEO WITH AN OPEN MIND AND
A RECEIVING HEART
